Betreff: Re: Nicht nur Teil 4 ?! (...)

---

Wie gesagt: Laut den Machern ist Indy nicht wirklich ein Indy-Film. Könnt ihr nicht akzeptieren, dass "Skull" als "verdammt miese Fortsetzung" betrachtet wird?

Hier mal ein paar Quotes von FM. Da sind teilweise faustdicke Lügen dabei... ;-)

Producer Frank Marshall stated that the film would be shot the same way as the previous three - with stunt men, and using CGI only when necessary.

or this...

Marschall: There’s been so many films that have tried to copy the Indiana Jones franchise and most of them have failed, except for the Bourne films. I think the reason people like Bourne is that he’s a credible, believable hero, much like Indiana Jones. Jason Bourne does some amazing things but that’s because he’s been so well trained in martial arts and different forms of killing so it’s not totally unbelievable, like the Mission Impossible films.

We looked at the Bourne films, and we thought that maybe Indiana Jones could do some more dangerous things in this film, and still have that seem BELIEVEABLE. The key is you have to believe that Indiana Jones can do the things he does and not say ‘There’s no way he could’ve survived that situation!’, so you walk a fine line. What sets the Indiana Jones films apart is that you can’t just call them action movies. They’re supernatural mysteries with elements of action and comedy and, in this film, some science fiction.

or this...

Marschall about "Indy I - III":

"One of the things I enjoy about these movies is that they do recall the old cliffhanger serials of the thirties and forties," said Marshall. "We didn't have computer effects in those days, we couldn’t easily erase things and I think one of the unfortunate by-products of the computer age is that it makes filmmakers lazy. You become more creative when you have to hide ramps with a tree rather than erase it later as you can today."

"In Raiders, that's a real ball rolling behind him so Harrison really is in some danger running in front of that; these are real situations and that adds to the excitement and the creative energy on the set."

Marschall about a part 4 in 2003

We're not done with the script on Indy 4 but I think we're going to try and rely, like the first two movies, on realism and not try to do too many things with the computer.

Marshall:
When you start getting into computers you get fantastical situations like in The Matrix or movies like that. We don't want that, we want exciting heroism, we want seat-of-your-pants, skin-of-your-teeth action. We didn't have all the money in the world on the first films and we want to keep that B-Movie feel. We want to make Indy 4 like we made the first three."

or this...

Frank Marshall / "The Indiana Jones Diaries"

"The challenge on Crystal Skull has been to get people to make the movie the same way we did the first three. On Temple of Doom, when Indy pushes the raft out of the airplane or cuts the rope bridge, we actually did it for real. Today, you do those shots in CG.

Stunts are so retro that the new Indiana Jones adventure, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, set for a May 22 release, is being sold as a deliberately old-fashioned picture just because it has real stunts: "We're not cheating with CG," producer Frank Marshall told the New Haven Register. "It keeps the B movie feel."

Edit von Mod: Provokation gelöscht.